Image source: Getty Images.
The biotech sector is a great hunting ground for investors who are after stocks that offer massive upside. If you buy shares in a company that goes on to create a blockbuster drug, the returns can be life-changing .
Of course, stocks that offer up extreme upside potential also tend to be fraught with risk, so potential investors need to be quite picky about which companies they choose to buy. With that in mind, here’s a list of three companies that risk-loving long-term-minded investors might want to consider giving a closer look.
1. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals
First up is Acadia (NASDAQ: ACAD) , a company that is in the middle of transitioning from a clinical-stage company into a commercial one, which can be a difficult transition to pull off.
Image source: Acadia Pharmaceuticals
Acadia’s upside potential rests solely in the hands of a single drug, called Nuplazid, which was just recently launched as a treatment for Parkinson’s disease psychosis, or PDP. This disease causes patients who have Parkinson’s to hallucinate and experience delusions, which makes it exceedingly difficult to care for them. That forces many people who develop PDP to be placed in nursing homes, increasing the cost of their care.
Acadia’s Nuplazid promises to help ease that burden, and it’s the first and only FDA-approved drug that treats PDP. Roughly 400,000 patients in the U.S. suffer from PDP, and Acadia has set a wholesale price of $23,400 annually. Acadia is also currently studying Nuplazid as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease psychosis and for schizophrenia.
Sales of Nuplazid got off to a slower-than-hoped-for start, but that’s no surprise since the company is still giving out free samples while it establishes reimbursement agreements. Acadia’s market cap is about $3.5 billion right now, and I see huge upside potential from there if Nuplazid can live up to its full potential.
2. Radius Health
Up next is Radius Health (NASDAQ: RDUS) , a biopharma that is focused on diseases of the bone. The company’s most important product candidate is named abaloparatide-SC. In late-stage clinical trials, patients who used this drug showed a 86% decrease in their risk of developing a spine fracture compared to the placebo group. Since more than 2 million osteoporosis-related bone fractures occur annually in the U.S. alone, abaloparatide-SC could help to prevent a lot of trips to the emergency room.
Radius has already submitted abaloparatide-SC to U.S. and European regulators for review, which gives the company a number of near-term catalysts. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, a European Union body, should be issuing its opinion on the drug in late 2016 or early 2017, and the FDA has set an approval decision date of March 30, 2017.
The only potential knock against abaloparatide-SC is that it requires a daily injection, whereas an experimental drug from biotech giant Amgen has shown clinical gains from a once-a-month injection. To help offset that potential negative, Radius is already developing abaloparatide-TC, which administers the drug through a transdermal patch instead of an injection and is in phase 2 development right now.
Peak sales estimates for abaloparatide are tough to judge given the huge patient population, but some analysts peg its potential in excess of a billion dollars annually. That suggests there could be upside from today’s valuation if regulators give the drug the green light.
Image source: Getty Images.
3. Sarepta Therapeutics
Rounding out today’s list is Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: SRPT) , a clinical-stage biotech primarily focused on rare diseases.
Sarepta’s most important compound is called eteplirsen, which could hopefully treat the deadly muscle-wasting disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD. Right now there are no approved treatments for this awful disease in the U.S., although a handful of companies have made attempts to get the green light over the past year. Of these companies, only Sarepta is still in the running.
Of course, it’s quite hard to handicap the company’s chances of success. On the one hand, during the FDA’s advisory committee meeting to discuss eteplirsen, a lot of criticism was lobbed at Sarepta for its methodology used to collect data in its clinical trial. On the other hand, there’s a clear unmet medical need for a drug that helps to treat DMD, and eteplirsen is the last drug still standing.
Despite the negative comments made during the advisory committee meeting, the FDA has twice delayed its decision data on eteplirsen, and it recently requested data from the company’s ongoing confirmatory study. The agency wants to see more data regarding the drug’s ability to restore production of dystrophin, a protein important in muscle function, in patients with DMD. If the FDA sees data that convinces them that eteplirsen helps to restore dystrophin levels, then they may be willing to give the drug the go-ahead.
Sarepta’s share price has been unbelievably volatile over the past year given the never-ending string of news, but the company’s current market cap of roughly $1.3 billion will look tiny if everything goes according to plan.
Are any worth buying?
All three of these stocks are high-risk, high-reward propositions, so I’d advise investors to approach all three with caution. However, if forced to choose, I’d have to say that Acadia is my favorite stock of this group since it’s already sailed through the regulatory approval process. In addition, I’m also encouraged that Nuplazid will have the PDP market all to itself, which gives the drug automatic demand . If management can successfully execute on its commercialization strategy, then I could easily see shareholders making out like bandits.
Brian Feroldi has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.
Like this article? Follow Brian on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @Longtermmindset , or connect with him on LinkedIn to see more articles like this.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy . The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. Offer from the Motley Fool: A secret billion-dollar stock opportunity
Got a spare quarter-million bucks sitting around?
If you’re a 65-year-old couple retiring this year you’ll need even more than that to cover health care and medical expenses throughout retirement, according to Fidelity Investments’ annual cost estimate.
Fidelity estimates it will cost a couple $280,000 to cover their health care costs in retirement, up 2% from last year and 75% since its 2002 estimate of $160,000. The math assumes a couple retires at 65 and is eligible for Medicare. The cost for care for males in retirement is an estimated $133,000, while the tab for women, who tend to live longer than men, is $147,000.
“Covering health care costs remains one of the most significant, yet unpredictable, aspects of retirement planning,” said Shams Talib, executive vice president and head of Fidelity Benefits Consulting. “It’s important for individuals to educate themselves and … take steps while working to ensure they are prepared to address these costs. Otherwise, people risk having to dip into more of their savings than originally anticipated.”
The financial pain could be more acute for Americans who retire early, the study found. Fidelity recently polled 1,000 people between 50 and 64 who have retired in the past three years and found that while almost all had some form of health insurance, 36% were paying $500 a month or more in health care premiums.
When early retirees were asked how they were paying for out-of-pocket premiums, co-pays and insurance plan deductibles, about half (49%) said they were “dipping into personal savings,” 24% were relying on Social Security income and 15% used retirement savings.
More: Baby Boomers fall short on emergency savings, put retirement at risk
More: Investing advice: Should I invest in gold and silver? Ask a Fool for the answer
More: Financial procrastination: You’ll act on these tips — one of these days